top of page

Fictionkin in the Vampyre Community

I've commented before on how in recent years the community at large has become a little more welcoming to viewpoints and identities that in the past were controversial. In the past this usually revolved around lifestyle vampyres or the legitimacy of psychic vampyres when compared to sanguinary vampyres. In the present I have personally noted a large influx of fictionkin into vampyre spaces and I believe it's important that we examine the elephant in the room.


Fictionkin are those that identify in some way with fictional characters. This may be psychologically, spiritually, or otherwise. Sometimes the identification is because someone is a plural system and one of their alters is a fictional character. Sometimes the identification is because of a belief that they are reincarnated from an alternate universe where the character is not fictional but a real person. The specific beliefs seem to vary as much as the people that hold them. People may identify with characters like Lestat, Alucard, or virtually any vampire or vampiric character from fiction; print, movies, video games, etc.


It is understandable that those that approach vampyrism and the community from a position of lived experience would have reservations about accepting fictionkin into the fold. Many vampyres take the lived experience of vampyrism very seriously and anything that could make them and their experience look even more suspect is viewed with suspicion. There is a concern of one's condition or experiences being lumped in with escapism, fantasy, and roleplay. There are corners of the community that have fought long and hard for even a shred of mainstream legitimacy outside of Halloween season documentaries and I suspect that for these people bringing fictionkin into the community would be seen as a setback for legitimacy.


It could be argued that most vampyres have themselves been influenced by fiction. Some are awakened by exposure to certain fiction. Many use terminology derived from works of fiction. Lifestylers quite literally model their lives after fictional portrayals of the much older vampire myth. Fiction and myth are the lens through which we come to view our experiences as vampyric in the first place. Fiction and myth contain archetypes that resonate with all people on a deep level and what is difficult to express in words can sometimes best be expressed as a similarity with an already familiar character or trope. Stories are how we come to understand the world and ourselves and we all tell stories to ourselves about ourselves. Even the most staunchly traditional vampyre has a personal mythology that they've built up around themselves in their own mind.


I suspect everyone will have their own line in the sand as to what they will consider legitimate or not and what they are willing to accept as a bridge too far when it comes to acceptance of fictionkin within the Vampyre Community. I think that it is important to consider where we came from as a community and where we would like to go moving forward. Most of us did not choose our vampyrism, whatever form it may take, so perhaps the truth is in the staying power and longevity of the identification. If fictionkin is a fad or escapist fantasy it will most likely not stand the test of time whereas the Vampyre Current, while transforming, endures. As long as someone approaches community in a respectful and friendly way I see no reason to ostracize them for what amounts to a different opinion on the origin of vampyrism.


Let us remember that it is not wise for those in glass houses to throw stones.

3 Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating*
Rated 3 out of 5 stars.

Let me preface this in saying this was a good read and one I was excited to see cross my notifications. I openly welcome conversations about complexities in communities and was interested to sit down and dive into this.


With that said, there are a few things I’d like to notate:


Someone who is fictionkin is singular and identifies as a character. Someone who is plural has alters, but does not identify as that character. Now the host can be fictionkin as well, but it’s important to know that the host doesn’t define themself as that character. They are two very different experiences.


Some fictionkin do not link their vampirism or vampyrism (whichever term one prefers) to their fictional identity.…


Like

Lila
Lila
Aug 18
Rated 5 out of 5 stars.

Honestly.. I do agree. I think they are perfectly fine to be in the community and not have a repeat of what has happened before of gatekeeping. I don’t exactly understand fictionkin but like the blog says we all have our own origin or idea of vampirism

Like

Nova Nacht
Nova Nacht
Aug 16
Rated 5 out of 5 stars.

Another awesome blog!

Like
bottom of page